I'd say I am shocked that once her identity was revealed, the under-age prostitute that testified under oath she was paid to have sex with Sen. Menendez (D-NJ) has recanted, but that would be a lie. She stated several times she feared for her safety by coming forward. Now that she has spontaneously recanted, claiming she was paid for her testimony, left wing blogs and mainstream media are taking these new claims as fact.
Unfortunately, the lawyer who obtained the accuser's testimony maintains their accuracy. In addition, another prostitute, this one American, has also come forward claiming Menendez paid her for sex. Menendez is also under ethics violations for dealings with a campaign donor who was allegedly part of the under-age sex exploitation.
We only need to ask ourselves one thing. Is it more likely the under-age prostitute's claims are false and she was paid by an attorney to make them, despite the growing amount of corroborating evidence, or now that her identity has been publicly leaked, she was paid off or threatened to recant?