Thursday, November 20, 2014

Obama Declares, "Let Tyranny Reign!" Issues Illegal Executive Amnesty

Tonight, during the "Latino" Grammy Awards, President Obama will detail his illegal executive amnesty plan to an estimated 10 million Spanish speaking viewers of Univision.  Critics of the executive action are calling it illegal and no less than impeachable offense.  Supporters argue it is simply the President's authority to exercise prosecutorial discretion.

The problem is the plan is not prosecutorial discretion, which is defined in our justice system as the authority of a prosecutor to file charges, dismiss charges, or plea bargain.  Obama's prior orders with regards to his catch and release program of illegals would be an example of prosecutorial discretion.  The illegal alien is still apprehended for committing the crime, but instead of being deported they are just let go.

Others argue it is an example of enforcement discretion.  Enforcement discretion is the act of those in charge with enforcing the law to prioritize how those laws will be enforced.  An example of this would be when President Obama ordered the border patrol to stop arresting illegals with no prior violent criminal arrest and instead focus on those who have or are committing violent crimes.

In both cases, that is not what is happening here.  In this instance President Obama is not just choosing to not enforce existing immigration law, he is actually issuing green cards and work permits in violation of existing statute.

The process by which the federal government has authority to grant visas, ie work permits and green cards, is specifically outlined in several the two most recent of which are the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996.  Neither of which grants the executive branch authority to create new rules by which aliens will be granted green cards and/or work permits.

Let's get out of the weeds a bit and look at a couple of analogies being thrown around by the main stream media trying to provide cover for Obama's tyranny.


  1. Obama's executive amnesty is akin to police offers choosing to pull motorists over who are traveling 70 mph in a 50 mph speed zone while letting those traveling 60 mph in the same zone go.
  • There's a problem here.  First, if Obama's executive orders just said to arrest criminal illegal aliens and let the rest go, the analogy might apply.  But instead, and to borrow from the analogy being provided, he is in effect saying motorists travelling 60 should be pulled over and given a special license that allows them to travel indefinitely at any speed above the posted speed limit without fear or getting a ticket.
The second analogy being used may be an even more relevant example as to why Obama's executive action being illegal.



  1. Both Colorado and Washington have chosen to nullify federal drug laws by legalizing the production, sale, and consumption of marijuana in violation of the supremacy clause of the United States.  President Obama has used his executive discretion to order federal prosecutors and law enforcement officials to turn a blind eye to the illegal sale and consumption of marijuana in these states.
  • Again we find the executive discretion being used to simply not enforce the law.  The President has not gone that extra step to order that those selling, producing, and consuming marijuana in Colorado and Washington be given special permits to go ahead and do so anywhere in the country.
To make matters worse, and as has been pointed out numerous times by others, Obama himself admitted on numerous occasions in the past that what he is doing to night is outside his authority, illegal, and unconstitutional.

Go back even further and read his book and you will find he readily admits that illegal aliens have a devastating impact on America's blue collar and low-skilled work force.  He admits they severely depress wages and drastically reduce opportunity for the most susceptible in our society.

What the president is doing is a crime, a treasonous crime.  The question becomes is whether Americans have become so pacified that they will accept the tyranny and go one about their lives or will they stand up and fight back against an out of control tyrant whose administration just today joyful embraced the opinion that Obama is a dictator.


Friday, November 14, 2014

Gruber Was Right, Democrat Voters are Stupid

It's the story that just won't die even though the mainstream media seems less than interested in a serious of videos produced by MIT professor Jonathan Gruber, key architect of the Obamacare legislation, in which he reveals the ways in which he and other Democrats had to craft the legislation in order to trick stupid American voters.

And make no mistake about it, when Gruber talks about the stupidity of American voters, he is specifically speaking about the stupidity of Democrat voters.  His videos were produced and released in 2013, meaning he was fully aware of the millions of Americans who were not fooled and who marched on Washington in opposition to the law.

He is not alone in the belief that Democrat voters are stupid.  Yesterday, Nancy Pelosi was asked about the growing Jonathan Gruber scandal and instead of owning up to their deceit, she chose to continue the lies by claiming she had no idea who Jonathan Gruber was and that he had no part in crafting the Obamacare legislation.

One problem, well two really, Nancy herself was caught on tape in 2009 bragging about Gruber's involvement on Obamacare and two years ago the NY Times released a story on Obamacare in which the White House is quoted as saying Jonathan Gruber was the key architect of the legislation and was sent to congress to work with staffers to draft the specifics of the law.

Even with her hand caught squarely in the cookie jar, Pelosi believes if she continues to to deny, Democrat voters will believe her.  She is probably right, how else could you explain what president Obama said about the keystone pipeline yesterday?

Yesterday when pressed on the approval of the Keystone XL pipeline President Obama stated approval depended on weighing the impact the pipeline would have on "climate change" versus lower energy costs.  Once again the President is telling his base and the American people a bold face lie.

As the president himself pointed out on Friday, even if the Keystone pipeline is not built, Canada will still pump the oil out of the ground.  They will then load the oil on rail lines and ship it to the cost where oil tankers will send it over the ocean to China where they will burn it off for fuel.  If climate change were a concern of the presidents, he would immediately approve the pipeline because the pipeline will result in less carbon emissions.  It would save on the emissions from the diesel power train engines.  It would save on the emissions from the diesel powered oil tanker engines.  And most importantly, much of the fuel would be burned in the U.S., which has much higher emissions standards than China.

While it is true the Keystone pipeline is not likely to have a dramatic reduction on the price of fuel, it is true that any increase in global supply does have a reductive effect.  In addition, the tens of thousands of high paying jobs that will be created for Americans is critical to economic growth in the country.

But again, we find the president and other Democrat leaders, just don't care about the truth that is blatant to see.  They have an agenda an they know their support is built up of the most ignorant and uninformed voters on the planet and they can continue to tell bold faced lies that their supporters will believe and vote for.

Friday, October 31, 2014

American Federation of Government Employees, affiliate of the AFL-CIO, Urges Americans to Stand Up to Obama's Illegal Executive Amnesty Plan

The full press release can be viewed here:


USCIS COUNCIL PRESIDENT ISSUES URGENT PLEA TO NATION REGARDING EXECUTIVE AMNESTY 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 
October 28, 2014
Contact: National Citizenship & Immigration Services Council
WASHINGTON – Kenneth Palinkas, President of the National Citizenship and Immigration Services Council representing 12,000 United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) adjudicators and personnel, issued the following statement today concerning the President’s planned executive immigration orders that would result 
in the issuance of 34 million green cards and employment authorization documents:“United States Citizenship and Immigration Service’s loyal and dedicated adjudicators and personnel diligently man the front lines in the battle to protect Americans from terrorism and the abuse of our economic and political resources. As the individuals who screen the millions of 
applications for entry into the U.S., it is our job to ensure that terrorists, diseases, criminals, public charges, and other undesirable groups are kept out of the United States. Unfortunately, we have been blocked in our efforts to accomplish this mission and denied the professional resources, mission support, and authorities we urgently need by the very same government that employs our skill sets. Although we had thought that we had made some headway through newly negotiated policies such as the Quality Workplace Initiative, we find that our caseworkers still operate under a quota system that prioritizes speed over quality, and approvals over investigations. Numbers of mandated interviews that had at one time decreased to afford quality decisions are creeping back up in the government’s efforts to process “customers” without regard to national security. There are plans to waive interviews of applicants who seek adjustment of their status in the U.S. to ready our workforce for the coming onslaught of applications unforeseen in previous administrations.
We are still the world’s rubber-stamp for entry into the United States – regardless of the ramifications of the constant violations to the Immigration and Nationality Act. Whether it’s the failure to uphold the public charge laws, the abuse of our asylum procedures, the admission of Islamist radicals, or visas for health risks, the taxpayers are being fleeced and public safety is being endangered on a daily basis.
I write today to warn the general public that this situation is about to get exponentially worse – and more dangerous. America dodged a bullet when the Senate immigration package S. 744 was blocked by the House. That legislation would have been a financial and security catastrophe. But news reports have leaked information to the public of a USCIS management contract bid for a “surge” printing of 34 million green cards and employment authorization documents to be provided to foreign nationals, a bid that predicts the Administration’s promised executive amnesty. This massive unilateral amnesty is slated to be issued after the November 2014 elections. Efforts by members of the Senate to block this action were stopped in their tracks by 52 Senators who, on July 31st, defeated a legislative maneuver to prohibit the President’s actions. 
That is why this statement is intended for the public: if you care about your immigration security and your neighborhood security, you must act now to ensure that Congress stops this unilateral amnesty. Let your voice be heard and spread the word to your neighbors. We who serve in our nation’s immigration agencies are pleading for your help – don’t let this happen. Express your concern to your Senators and Congressmen before it is too late.”

Democrats Urging Illegals to Register and Vote In Wide Spread Voter Fraud Scandal

Undercover video in North Carolina exposes Democrats instructing illegal aliens to register and vote:


Virginia Voters Alliance discovers illegal aliens registered to vote in Maryland and Virginia:
The lawsuit, filed Friday in U.S. District Court in Baltimore, asserts that individuals who opted out of jury duty because they were not legal U.S. residents have cast ballots in at least three Maryland elections. 
Based on the number of potential unqualified voters identified in Frederick County, up to 7 percent of Maryland’s registered voters could be illegal immigrants, according to estimates.
Old Dominion University study finds large percentage of non-citizens voting.  Finds illegal votes stole key senate and congressional races for Democrats:
We find that some non-citizens participate in U.S. elections, and that this participation has been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes, and Congressional elections. Non-citizen votes likely gave Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress.
12,500 voter registrations in Kansas unable to prove citizenship:
Kobach told the House Elections Committee that his department continues to whittle away at that list and the proof of citizenship and voter identification requirements he spearheaded have been effective in preventing noncitizen "aliens" from voting.
Kobach said he and his staff had identified 20 noncitizens who registered to vote before the proof of citizenship requirements were in place. Five of them had actually voted, casting a total of eight ballots, with one of them voting in four successive elections.
Kobach said that there may be more, but it is extremely difficult to find them. His office was able to find some by cross-checking Division of Vehicles records of noncitizen Kansas driver's license holders with the voter registration names.
He said his staff has also cross-checked registration names with those of some Kansans who have said they aren’t citizens when summoned to jury duty.

Thursday, October 30, 2014

Paul Davis Supporters Caught on Tape Stealing Campaign Literature


Raging liberals and Paul Davis supporters, Janice and David Norlin, were caught on tape earlier this week going door-to-door stealing campaign literature of Republicans.  The two were caught red handed by volunteers from the J.R. Claeys' campaign.

When confronted, the two perps threatened to call the police.  When informed by the eye witnesses of the crime that they would be happily invite police presence since what the Democrats were doing was a crime the Norlins hightailed it to their car to make a speedy getaway.

A video of the incident can be viewed here.

Janice Norlin is a member of the Kansas League of Women Voters.  She is an attorney and president of the Osborne, KS Chamber of Commerce.  In addition, is a self proclaimed, "facilitator for two Kansas Department of Education grants for gender equity and sexuality-AIDS for K-12," and Social Justice Warrior for Salina’s Unitarian Universalist Fellowship church.

David Norlin is a former instructor for Cloud County Community College and chairman of Community Access Television.

Both are liberal activists that are currently contributing authors.  David Norlin to the Kansas Free Press and Janice Norlin with the Salina Journal.

It should come as no surprise that their writing is about as truthful as you'd expect from criminals willing to do anything for power.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Republicans Outpacing Democrat Early Voting Nearly 2 to 1 in KS 3rd Congressional District


Most recent data on early voting in Kansas sorted by congressional district shows a big lead for Republicans in the upcoming mid-term elections.  These results seem to echo recent polls which show Governor Brownback with growing momentum and now leading his democrat challenger, Paul Davis and incumbent Senator Pat Roberts leading so-called independent Greg Orman.





Thursday, October 23, 2014

Should Republicans Move to the Center?

Notorious Obamacare supporter and Republican Insurance Commissioner of KS says she is endorsing leftist Democrats Paul Davis for governor and Greg Orman for Senate because she wants to see the Republican Party move back to the center.

Ever wonder why no one says the Democrats need to move to the center?  Ever wonder why the Democrats continue to move farther left and why policies once championed by liberal icons like John F Kennedy are now considered extreme right wing ideas?

Well, wonder no more.  Here is a simple graphic to illustrate it for you:




Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Democrats in North Carolina Return to an Old Tactic, Allege Vote Irregularities Even When There Are None

Judicial Watch reporting:

NAACP Speaker’s Alleged Remarks: Let’s Create Confusion During the Nov. 2014 Election By Deliberately Misleading Voters

OCTOBER 21, 2014 - According to a letter from a lawyer for the State of North Carolina to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), a speaker at a recent NAACP conference in North Carolina urged audience members to mislead the NAACP’s own members into believing they do not need to register to vote in advance, or that they do not need to vote at their assigned polling place. Why?  The letter alleges: To create confusion and animosity during the upcoming mid-term elections in North Carolina, and to use the evidence of that confusion in the ongoing litigation between Eric Holder’s Justice Department and North Carolina and to show that North Carolina’s election integrity laws are discriminatory. From the letter:
It is also our understanding that during the [NAACP conference], Rev. Barber urged those in attendance to take unregistered voters to vote during the Early Voting period and to engage in get-out-the vote activities that included transporting registered voters to vote in precincts in which they are not assigned to vote on Election Day, or words to that effect. The stated purpose for these activities, as I understand it, was to gather evidence for and thereby enhance plaintiffs prospects of success in the litigation involving [North Carolina’s Election Integrity Laws].
Judicial Watch has been actively involved in this sprawling North Carolina election litigation for the past two years. Judicial Watch has filed two amicus briefs in this case, one in 2013 and one in 2014, supporting North Carolina and election integrity. On both occasions, we were joined in our brief by our partner the Allied Educational Foundation and by local political activist Christina Merrill.  We also gave oral arguments and submitted an expert witness report to the trial court explaining that no one is harmed by these election integrity laws, but rather, these laws prevent fraud and ensure all Americans are confident that election results are fair and honest.

If true, the fact that the NAACP’s leaders appear willing to risk the confusion and disenfranchisement of their own members in order to deceive a Court about common sense election integrity laws speaks volumes about the intellectual bankruptcy of the left’s arguments.  The left’s weak arguments also explain why the U.S. Supreme Court, by a 7 to 2 vote, recently overruled the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals’ temporary injunction and held that North Carolina’s laws comply with federal law and should be used during the November 2014 election.  The litigation between North Carolina and the DOJ is expected to proceed further in 2015.